Main menu

Pages

12 angry men 1957 movie : best master scenes

 12 angry men 1957 movie : best master scenes


first , i suppose you saw 12 angry men 1957 movie , so i wrote this post , if you don't so go and see it please.


number one :



The beginning of the scene is when they brought the folded knife into the room to see it, and one of the jurors asked Juror Number Eight about his request for them to accept a supernatural coincidence that the boy who killed his father lost this folded knife, and that another person had picked it up and gone to his father’s apartment and killed him, and he was justified in doing so. The shape of the knife was unusual and unique, so juror number eight produced another knife from his pocket, which exactly and precisely resembled the shape of the murder knife. The others were very aware of this and this excited them, and they asked him how he found it, and he told them that he had bought it from a store in the boy’s neighborhood. Juror number three told him what this proves, and another asked him about his demand that they believe that whoever stabbed the boy’s father was carrying a knife very similar to it. He told them that this was possible, and they answered him that it was a very weak possibility.

They then stuck to their opinion and did not change it, as it was a very weak possibility and he knew that, and he only had that point at that moment, so he asked them to secretly vote on whether the boy was guilty or not guilty, and if everyone was still convinced that he was guilty He will change his mind, and they will take the criminalization decision to the judge, but if someone changes his mind, they will stay and discuss the matter further.

Juror number nine actually changed his mind in this ballot, and his justification was that he wanted to give support to a person who would stand alone in the face of others’ ridicule of his belief in the boy’s innocence, and this was the real beginning of the film, and the lifeline that is thrown to the drowning person before he drowns.


What distinguished this scene was its realism, because juror number eight was not sure of the boy’s innocence at this early time, but he had an incomplete feeling of doubt, and he wanted motivation from anyone to continue his thinking and discussion of this crime, even before he turned his back on them. At the time of the secret ballot, he looked at each of them with a quick glance, and deep down he was saying which of them would give me support, despite his clear feeling of frustration at this happening, and when you look at his features when he heard the word not guilty, it was as if you had given a splash of oxygen to a person who was taking his last breath.

As for juror number nine, he was a man who respected others and their motives, and this was clear in his words and manner, and this is what made him change his mind and he also understood that a man’s life was at stake, so the matter must be discussed in a more detailed manner than what the rest of the jurors wanted by summarizing the matter.



12 angry men 1957 movie_scene 1
















number two :


When they brought the plan of the apartment and represented what one of the witnesses had told him, who was the neighbor of the dead man who lived directly below his apartment, and after proving in practice that his testimony was far from the supposed reality, Juror Number Three became unnaturally revolted against them, and he described them as old ladies, and said that the boy He deserves to be burned because he is guilty, and they will let him escape from their hands. When juror number eight was astonished at what he said, he asked him, “Are you the executioner?” He replied to him, saying that he was one of them, and Number Eight replied that he might want to personally execute the death sentence on this boy.

Number Three responded that he really wanted this for this boy specifically, so Number Eight told him that he felt sorry for him, and also told him that he saw him positioning himself as a general avenger, and that he wanted to see the boy dead anyway because he wanted that, and not because of the facts of the case, and then He finally described him as a sadist.

This last word prompted Number Three to attack Number Eight as he shouted forcefully, “I will kill you,” which made Number Eight respond to him intelligently and with a calm smile on his lips. He said, “You don’t really mean to kill me, do you?” The man was shocked and knew at that moment that Number Eight had been able to provoke him to reach that point, when the witness neighbor heard the son screaming at his father that he was going to kill him. This was a matter of question because many say that, but this does not mean definitively that they will be carried out.

Number Three moved away to the middle of the room, turning his back to everyone, and he noticed them with his eyes looking at him in astonishment, and each one of them wondered deep down about his abnormal reaction, and whether the matter had a personal meaning for him.

The scene carried within it the shrewdness with which Number Eight dealt, and his attention also to what was going on in the depths of Number Three, in that he considered the matter personally. He performed the scene with great skill, but Number Three excelled in coming up with the reaction with more skill, of course. It made me feel nervous. Very strongly, and it made me wonder whether it is possible to keep personal bias away in a situation like this, which is considered the deciding factor in a person’s life.



12 angry men 1957 movie_scene 2

















Number three :


When Juror Number Ten shouted at the jurors who had changed their votes to not guilty, and he blamed them for it, he was extremely agitated as if it were a personal matter. His emotion was very distinct as they stood up one by one , And they began to turn their backs to him in a way that suggested boredom and dissatisfaction with his behavior. The frequency of his screaming began to gradually decrease until he found himself speaking to no one, and one of them told him to be silent and not to open his mouth again, so he began to move slowly from his place to move away from the table at which they were sitting, and he sat in despair and frustration on a chair in the corner of the room.

It was a very powerful scene that highlighted the extent to which the constant screaming from this person affected them. Their reaction was stronger than ripping out his tongue from its place, and they performed the scene very brilliantly, highlighting that they are a very distinguished cast.


12 angry men 1957 movie_scene 3



















number four:


The last scene of the movie, which is the most wonderful of all, is a long scene, but it carries the implicit meaning of the movie, as one of the jurors noticed that the woman who saw the crime was not wearing her glasses in front of the court to appear younger, and that she testified to seeing the crime through the cars of the passing train, and It was also late at night, and she was in her bed getting ready to sleep when she saw the crime, and no one wearing glasses was definitely about to sleep.

This remark shocked everyone, especially juror number four, because he was wearing glasses and knew this more than anyone, and this actually made him convinced that the boy was innocent. Testimony from a woman like this cannot be relied upon, which prompted everyone to emphasize the strength of this point in Great interaction.

Juror number four change in his position caused Juror number three to become agitated again. He shouted at them that they pity a murderer, and that they were bending the neck of the truth. They left him in this extreme agitation while they looked at him in silence. He shouted at them that they would not dissuade him from his position, and when He told them what will we do now? Juror number eight replied that he was alone now, and he meant that he believed the boy was guilty, so he replied that it was his right.

Juror number eight told him that they wanted to hear his argument on that, so he replied that he had told them about it, so he asked him to tell them again because they were not convinced, so he stood up and started telling them again while he was very excited. Anger was filling him and ravaging his being. Then he took out his wallet and indicated that the points were written. In a small piece of paper with it, it fell on the table due to his extreme excitement, and from it fell a picture of him with his son whom he had abandoned two years ago. They were looking at him in silence, so he shouted at them to speak and say anything, but they did not respond, so he told them that they were people with compassionate hearts and fools, and His eyes fell on a picture of him and his son at that time. His eyes were describing what was inside him in a terrible and absolutely amazing scene. He was saying that they were corrupt children, and that a person would waste his life for them. Suddenly he grabbed the picture violently and began to tear it apart, trembling with emotion, and his features bore uncontrollable anger. It was normal, then he suddenly collapsed and closed his eyes while sobbing and said that he was not guilty. He fell in his chair, covering his face and eyes with his forearm, crying and trembling.

Then the scene came for them to get up and prepare to enter the court and declare that the boy was not guilty, but they were in deep psychological pain because of what Juror Number Three was feeling, and Juror Number Eight brought the jacket for Number Three, and helped him put it on while looking at him with pity, then they left. From the room.


12 angry men 1957 movie_scene 4















my words



  • One of the best, most amazing,  and exciting scenes ever in the history of movies. The faces and emotions of those present were very expressive, and their silence at the time of his revolt and anger was the best reaction. They let him empty his negative charge and highlight the real reason for his adherence to his opinion. His features and eyes were... His mouth and the tone of his voice were very consistent with his bad feeling towards his son who had abandoned him, and all of this was reflected in the case of the boy who was accused of killing his father, and I am almost certain that his feeling at the time was that his son had also killed him without a weapon.

  • What a wonderful scene and what a beautiful movie, as it embodied characters who suffer greatly in this life, and each one of them has his own type of suffering, but what is important here is how this is reflected on others.
















Comments

table of contents title